In today's Europe, several groups claim special political rights on the grounds
that they constitute peoples. This applies both to state-bearing groups such as
the Serbs, Estonians and Greeks, as well as to larger and smaller groups that
are in the minority in the state where they live. Among the minority groups,
there is reason to distinguish between different types of peoples, as their
self-understanding, problems and demands vary by type. One can distinguish
between three basic types: micronations, national minorities and ethnic
minorities.
- COUNTRYAAH.COM:
Offers an alphabetical list of independent nations and dependent territories
in Europe. Also includes area and population for each European country.
Micronations
Micronations are characterized by having a delimited territory with which the
group in question has a historically documented relationship. The peoples of
micronations can be quite large like Catalonia's approximately 7.5 million
residents and quite small like the Sami, who count approximately 60,000. The
micro-nations to varying degrees demand political independence in line with
state-bearing peoples, nations. Their demands thus concern the sovereignty of
the states, which they contest within their own territory. The micronations are
also characterized by the fact that there is no state where their culture and
language are dominant.

National minorities
National minorities are groups that identify with the language and culture of
a neighboring country. In Western Europe, these groups usually do not demand
border revisions, but greater local autonomy and recognition of their language
on an equal footing with the dominant one. In Eastern Europe, national
minorities are seen as a danger to political stability, and many of their
organizations demand more or less loud border controls. The demands of national
minorities thus, like the potential of the micro-nations, relate to the
sovereignty of the states.
Ethnic minorities
The actual ethnic minorities differ significantly from these two groups,
primarily because their identity and political ambitions are not tied to
territorial conditions. They do not invoke home countries in Europe, although
two of the most well-known ethnic minorities, the Jews and the Roma, both have a
long history as European peoples. Only a few small groups of ethnic minorities
in Europe make demands that will affect the sovereignty of states, especially
with regard to issues of dual citizenship. Most simply demand the right to
organize around linguistic and religious matters.
Recent European historical background of ideas
The background for self-understanding and demands among all three groups must
be found in recent European history of ideas. For the past millennium, Europe
has been largely organized according to dynastic or geopolitical principles
rather than ethnic and/or linguistic community. Nevertheless, in modern times
one also distinguishes between different peoples or ethnic groups, which are
defined in particular on the basis of linguistic criteria. The European language
families were scientifically established in the 19th century based on the
discovery of the common features of the Indo-European languages. Communities in
particular were operated on the basis of Germanic, Celtic, Romance, Slavic and
Arabic languages. From the 1870's onwards, a certain political organization
according to language criteria took place in the so-called Pan-Slavic, Germanic,
etc. organizations. However, these attempts to organize Europeans politically by
language tribe yielded few practical results, as language families most often
stretched across established, political state borders. In the 20th century,
however, a number of smaller states were established on a linguistic policy
basis Czechoslovakia (later the Czech Republic), which from 1918 was established
as a federal state on the basis of the newly established Czech written language;
Finland (1917), Ireland (from 1921) and Iceland (from 1944). For all these
states (except Iceland), however, the political boundaries do not fully follow
the boundaries of the peoples if they are defined as language groups. The most
comprehensive and for a time effective attempt to base political organization on
a larger scale on peoples based on the language families is the Nazi
organization of Europe in the Third Reich 1933-1945.
The concept of people
The concept of peoples has played a central role for the territorially
delimited ethnic and linguistic minorities, the micronations of Europe. From the
1880's, powerful political organizations developed in a large number of
linguistic minority areas, which even today represent a significant political
power. This applied to Catalonia, the Basque Country, Brittany, Wales, Cornwall
and Scotland, all of which before 1900 had established their own written
language and political organizations based on the local language. A little later
came the organization of Occitania (Southern France), and around 1918 a movement
among micronations across Europe was so advanced that pan-European conferences
could be organized around common demands. Early in the interwar period, the
overarching political demand from these organizations was a federalization of
the existing states. Czechoslovakia was highlighted as a model that should be
extended to other multilingual states. However, fascism in Italy from 1922 and
especially Nazism in Germany from 1933 led many minorities to revise their views
on state organization on the basis of the idea of peoples. Both of these
totalitarian-led states appeared in the arena of peoples as pannational. Italy
thus described the enclaves of Romance-speaking minorities in neighboring
countries as "temporarily lost" Italian territories, such as Mussolini's
government demanded "back" to Italy. This applied to areas in France (Savoy,
Corsica, parts of the Riviera) and areas in Switzerland, Austria and on the
Yugoslav Adriatic coast. Similarly, Hitler's Germany considered not only the
whole of Austria, the German-speaking Czech Sudetenland and the German-speaking
French Alsace-Lorraineas belonging to the German Empire, but was also of the
conviction that the other Germanic-speaking areas of Europe constituted
independent states only by a historical misunderstanding. The conquest of these
territories was therefore justified on the basis of an idea of the common
destiny of the peoples. Although there were groups in the minority areas that
welcomed the fascist and Nazi initiatives, the majorities were apparently
skeptical, both because the totalitarian social structure in Germany and Italy
offered the intellectuals who formed the central groups in the minority
political organizations, and because the prospect of being absorbed into the
linguistic community of a larger mother or fatherland did not in fact meet their
demands for recognition as independent peoples.
Treaty of Versailles in 1919
The situation was a bit different for the national minorities, who had been
placed on the "wrong" side of a state border by relatively new demarcations,
especially the Treaty of Versailles in 1919, as they had always identified with
the neighboring state. South Tyrol and North Schleswigare examples of such areas
where national minorities who identified themselves as Germans sympathized to
some extent with the German ambitions to expand the state's territory. However,
neither the Schleswig nor the Tyrolean border was moved. In South Tyrol, a
referendum in 1939 showed that there was no majority for a border change, after
which a significant part of the German minority emigrated to Germany. In
Schleswig, the border had similarly been determined by a 1919 referendum.
World War II and the post-war period
For certain ethnic minorities in Europe, the notion of peoples came to play a
particularly cruel role during World War II. Jews and Roma were systematically
murdered as "foreign elements" in Europe, and especially in Germany and in the
rest of Central Europe, this meant that these peoples almost disappeared. After
the end of the war, the Jews established a state outside Europe, based on the
European notion of peoples. The creation of Israel can thus be seen as a direct
consequence of the idea of political organization by peoples. In the immediate
post-war period, this political thought was discredited in Europe, but from the
late 1960's it re-emerged as the core of minorities' self-understanding in
relation to European nation-states. Several micronations seized weapons during
this period, from the Basque Country across Catalonia to Corsica. Certain
national minorities - in Northern Ireland and South Tyrol - also developed
terrorist organizations. The majority of Western European minorities, however,
confined themselves to an ideological strife, in which they in turn had some
progress. In today's overviews of micro-nations and national minorities in
Europe, about 80 named and organized communities appear. Within the European
Union, micro-nations and national minorities have found allies in the European
Commission as well as some community in the European Parliament in Strasbourg.
In 1994, the Regional Advisory Council was established, in which the views of
the minority areas play a significant role, as did the Council of Europe, where,
among other things, non-EU member states have adopted recommendations on
cultural self-determination for minorities.
The most acute problems in Europe at the end of the 20th century have, as
always, the ethnic minorities; the Arab, Iranian, Turkish, Pakistani and Indian
minorities as well as the Roma are often subjected to aggression and suspicion
in a Europe where the idea of peoples as the obvious political basis is alive
again. |